By: Gina Morelli
No one knows Kamala Harris’s scandalous history better than this man.
He took action to expose her obsession with banning guns.
And in doing so he risked drawing her wrath on himself.
Kamala Harris is trying to portray herself as a moderate during this presidential election, but it is the first time in her political career that she has ever tried to do that.
Up until she became the nominee, Harris spent her entire career trying to build a brand for herself as a fearless progressive who would push left-wing policies and attack the right.
This meant taking extreme positions on everything from social issues to economics to guns in order to endear herself to the most extreme elements of the Democrat base.
Now she is trying to erase all of that history in order to appeal to swing voters in America, but one man from California remembers everything that she has done in her career.
Chuck Michel is an attorney with a long history in California politics who has litigated on behalf of gun owners, and he knows just how bad Harris’s history is with the Second Amendment.
Here is what Michel had to say, according to Fox News: “Kamala Harris never met a gun control law that she didn’t like. She supported everything that the extreme progressive San Francisco City Council ever proposed. She tried to limit concealed carry by intervening in a court case to block a Ninth Circuit win. She obviously supported Prop H. And she supported the D.C. handgun ban with an amicus brief in the Heller case that she took the lead on. And she certified microstamping.”
Michel’s warning should be heeded by anyone who owns a gun and is considering supporting Kamala Harris for president.
There are many voters who may lean left on a number of issues, but still choose to own guns for the protection of their family.
These voters many not realize just how extreme her history is on this issue, but that’s why Michel is here to tell them.
The Fox News article continues, “However, throughout Harris’ long career, including stints as San Francisco district attorney and California attorney general, she repeatedly voiced support for banning or restricting citizens from legally possessing handguns. She also argued at the federal level that banning handguns does not violate the Constitution’s Second Amendment rights.”
“As San Francisco’s district attorney, Harris sponsored a 2005 ballot measure known as Proposition H that sought to ban the manufacture, sale or possession of pistols by San Franciscans unless they are a member of law enforcement, in the military or work in private security.”
Harris should simply state clearly how she is going to govern on the Second Amendment if she is elected to the White House.
If her views have changed and she is no longer hostile to guns, she can say that, but she is going to have to give specifics.
Because if she does not, then people will be justified in assuming that Chuck Michel is right, and she is an anti-gun extremist.